100% Less Tell Em' Steve Dave!
25/08/11 08:22
Well, where do I start? I used to listen to quite a few of the Smodcast Podcast Network’s programs. Let’s see there was, Smodcast, Tell Em’ Steve Dave, Blowhard, Plus One, Hollywood Babylon, and Jay and Silent Bob get old. Over the last couple months I’ve whittled these podcasts down to three. Before I get into why I still listen to those three, let’s start by talking about why I stopped listening to the others.
Tell Em’ Steve Dave
This show was much better when the participants had no idea what they were doing. I don’t know where along the line it stopped being funny, but the final straw for me came in the form of two podcasts back to back in which Bryan, Walt and Q did nothing but talk about what they were gong to do on another podcast for Zune. I was already wading through an hour and half of crap to yield a half hour of funny. Now they want me to listen to three hours of crap for what, 45 minutes of funny? It just wasn’t good time management. So I deleted the old ones and unsubscribed. I know it’s free guys but in a world where most people can’t seem to make much money time becomes currency!
Blowhard
Malcolm Ingram is a very interesting guy who has a million stories about all sorts of interesting things he’s seen and done in his life. Unfortunately all he wants to talk about is sucking cock. When Malcolm first started podcasting with his Mom, it seemed to me that he was an example of a gay man that a straight guy like me could actually be friends with. Despite the addition of a lesbian co-host to spice up the heterosexual male angle, the show still seemed to delve too much into gay anal sex while ignoring all other aspects of Malcolm and his life. You’re going to say I’m homophobic, and you’d be wrong. If I knew someone who talked about golf as much as Malcolm Ingram talks about sucking cock, I’d stop listening to them too!
Plus One
It was obvious from the get go that Kevin’s wife Jennifer wanted to make Plus One an interesting and informative podcast. There is one main problem. Her co-host is so stoned off his ass he either doesn’t understand what she’s talking about, or just flat out makes fun of her the entire time. I stopped listening after a number of episodes where Jennifer started a discussion on a topic that interested me, only to be thwarted by the stoney shenanigans of the ”too stoned to comprehend” Smith. Sorry Jen, maybe if you did a podcast with a friend or something?
I still listen to Hollywood Babylon, Jay and Silent Bob Get Old and Smodcast, because they all have the magic formula. Kevin just really shines when he’s paired with someone who is either way dumber or way smarter than he is.
Tell Em’ Steve Dave
This show was much better when the participants had no idea what they were doing. I don’t know where along the line it stopped being funny, but the final straw for me came in the form of two podcasts back to back in which Bryan, Walt and Q did nothing but talk about what they were gong to do on another podcast for Zune. I was already wading through an hour and half of crap to yield a half hour of funny. Now they want me to listen to three hours of crap for what, 45 minutes of funny? It just wasn’t good time management. So I deleted the old ones and unsubscribed. I know it’s free guys but in a world where most people can’t seem to make much money time becomes currency!
Blowhard
Malcolm Ingram is a very interesting guy who has a million stories about all sorts of interesting things he’s seen and done in his life. Unfortunately all he wants to talk about is sucking cock. When Malcolm first started podcasting with his Mom, it seemed to me that he was an example of a gay man that a straight guy like me could actually be friends with. Despite the addition of a lesbian co-host to spice up the heterosexual male angle, the show still seemed to delve too much into gay anal sex while ignoring all other aspects of Malcolm and his life. You’re going to say I’m homophobic, and you’d be wrong. If I knew someone who talked about golf as much as Malcolm Ingram talks about sucking cock, I’d stop listening to them too!
Plus One
It was obvious from the get go that Kevin’s wife Jennifer wanted to make Plus One an interesting and informative podcast. There is one main problem. Her co-host is so stoned off his ass he either doesn’t understand what she’s talking about, or just flat out makes fun of her the entire time. I stopped listening after a number of episodes where Jennifer started a discussion on a topic that interested me, only to be thwarted by the stoney shenanigans of the ”too stoned to comprehend” Smith. Sorry Jen, maybe if you did a podcast with a friend or something?
I still listen to Hollywood Babylon, Jay and Silent Bob Get Old and Smodcast, because they all have the magic formula. Kevin just really shines when he’s paired with someone who is either way dumber or way smarter than he is.
Comments
Winning or Losing?
09/05/11 12:12
It was funny for a while, then it became interesting and now it’s just plain boring! I am referring of course to the bat-shit crazy rantings of one Charlie Sheen. When I first watched his Youtube videos I thought he was playing some sort of character based on himself. However when it continued and morphed into a travelling stage show I began to wonder if Charlie was playing into some people’s need to see the rich and famous go down in flames, or if his brain had finally disconnected itself from reality as a result of years of hardcore drug use.
In the final analysis I suppose it’s a lose/lose situation. If he’s merely portraying a fall from stardom Lindsay Lohan is way better at it and he should stick to making mediocre (but popular) TV shows. If he’s come unhinged mentally, then it’s wrong to use him for entertainment purposes! Either way you slice it, it’s pretty much done now and can only end badly.
In the final analysis I suppose it’s a lose/lose situation. If he’s merely portraying a fall from stardom Lindsay Lohan is way better at it and he should stick to making mediocre (but popular) TV shows. If he’s come unhinged mentally, then it’s wrong to use him for entertainment purposes! Either way you slice it, it’s pretty much done now and can only end badly.
50% Less Kevin Smith #Smodcast
13/03/11 06:59
Ok,
I started listening to the Smodcast Podcast around episode 80 something and was almost instantly hooked. It reminded me of the kind of conversations I used to have with friends back in high school. The flights of whimsy that could go anywhere an overactive imagination would take you. You may know Kevin Smith and Scott Mosier as the duo that brought you films like “Clerks” and “Chasing Amy” and most recently “Zack and Miri make a porno”.
Because of my interest in Smodcast I also began listening to “Tell Em’ Steve Dave” and “The Toronto Ontario Mo’ and Glo show” that were also featured on the newly formed Smodcast network. TESD brought back the sharper wit that was somewhat blunted by Smith’s heavy pot use following the release of Zack & Miri. Malcolm Ingram’s podcast that originally began as a dialogue between he and his mother started off amazingly well. I began to think of Malcolm as an example of a gay man that I could be friends with, that is until he announced that his next project would be a documentary about Lady Gaga. I don’t care who you are, you’re welcome to talk about Gaga all you want, just don’t expect me to listen! As luck would have it a new podcast named “Blowhard” and a much better project came along and I am once again a fan.
So, currently residing in my itunes I have, Smodcast, Tell Em’ Steve Dave, Blowhard, Jay & Silent Bob Get Old, Hollywood Babylon and Plus one. It’s a great lineup but there’s a problem. Every episode has 10 minutes of advertising jammed into the front end. Red State, Adam & Eve, and the new Smodcast Internet Radio ads at the top of each show. I know what you’re thinking, just skip it right?
Smith’s new film Red State is already becoming more about how it’s being marketed than it is about the content of the film. I guess that’s what happens when you stand on a stage with a hockey stick and proclaim that you’re giving birth to indie film marketing 2.0. I am wondering if even die hard Kevin Smith fans are gonna start suffering from Kevin Smith overload.
Is the new and eventually intended to be 24 hour internet radio station going to be Smith’s “Rattle & Hum”? We live in a consumer driven society and when people like something they consume lots of it. Sometimes if they swallow enough of it they get sick of it! I am starting to fear that this is what’s going to happen here.
For me, Kevin’s brand of comedy has been a refreshing departure from what is being offered to me every day. Am I going to burn out when there’s Kev Smith branded content available to me 24/7? Am I going to be able to resist the urge to listen my way through most of my waking hours? Well of course I am! You see I am not a moron. Trouble is, most people are, and demographically speaking the morons are the people that really count.
I started listening to the Smodcast Podcast around episode 80 something and was almost instantly hooked. It reminded me of the kind of conversations I used to have with friends back in high school. The flights of whimsy that could go anywhere an overactive imagination would take you. You may know Kevin Smith and Scott Mosier as the duo that brought you films like “Clerks” and “Chasing Amy” and most recently “Zack and Miri make a porno”.
Because of my interest in Smodcast I also began listening to “Tell Em’ Steve Dave” and “The Toronto Ontario Mo’ and Glo show” that were also featured on the newly formed Smodcast network. TESD brought back the sharper wit that was somewhat blunted by Smith’s heavy pot use following the release of Zack & Miri. Malcolm Ingram’s podcast that originally began as a dialogue between he and his mother started off amazingly well. I began to think of Malcolm as an example of a gay man that I could be friends with, that is until he announced that his next project would be a documentary about Lady Gaga. I don’t care who you are, you’re welcome to talk about Gaga all you want, just don’t expect me to listen! As luck would have it a new podcast named “Blowhard” and a much better project came along and I am once again a fan.
So, currently residing in my itunes I have, Smodcast, Tell Em’ Steve Dave, Blowhard, Jay & Silent Bob Get Old, Hollywood Babylon and Plus one. It’s a great lineup but there’s a problem. Every episode has 10 minutes of advertising jammed into the front end. Red State, Adam & Eve, and the new Smodcast Internet Radio ads at the top of each show. I know what you’re thinking, just skip it right?
Smith’s new film Red State is already becoming more about how it’s being marketed than it is about the content of the film. I guess that’s what happens when you stand on a stage with a hockey stick and proclaim that you’re giving birth to indie film marketing 2.0. I am wondering if even die hard Kevin Smith fans are gonna start suffering from Kevin Smith overload.
Is the new and eventually intended to be 24 hour internet radio station going to be Smith’s “Rattle & Hum”? We live in a consumer driven society and when people like something they consume lots of it. Sometimes if they swallow enough of it they get sick of it! I am starting to fear that this is what’s going to happen here.
For me, Kevin’s brand of comedy has been a refreshing departure from what is being offered to me every day. Am I going to burn out when there’s Kev Smith branded content available to me 24/7? Am I going to be able to resist the urge to listen my way through most of my waking hours? Well of course I am! You see I am not a moron. Trouble is, most people are, and demographically speaking the morons are the people that really count.
St. Padricks Day
11/03/11 15:29
I recently posted something on a Facebook group page. The actual content is not important, the point is that I referred to St. Patrick’s Day as St. Patty’s. Now that seems logical to me, and I’m sure to many of you as well. After all, it is St. Patrick’s day and not St. Padrick’s day. If it were St. Padrick it would make more sense to refer to it as St. Paddy’s day.
However according to someone who may or may not have been Irish, the Irish do indeed refer to St. Patricks day as St. Paddy’s. Now the obvious joke is that, when drunk and slurring words Patty, becomes Paddy. Go ahead and try it put on a fake drunk accent or if you have some spare time get an audio recording device and hoist a few! OR just watch that episode of “Rescue Me” that takes place on St. Patrick’s day.
Remember of course to keep accurate records because,... my theory is that if you can pinpoint the exact amount of alcohol it takes for the hard “t” sounds in “Patty” to become the decidedly softer “d” sounds present in the word “Paddy”. You may have discovered something of scientific importance.
Now the other thing. If you are one of those people who live to surf around and correct people’s posts. If literally every comment you leave has to do with correcting something someone else has said. Then please feel free to DIE, DIE, HURRY UP AND DIE!!!!!
Have a happy and safe St. Patrick’s Day..
However according to someone who may or may not have been Irish, the Irish do indeed refer to St. Patricks day as St. Paddy’s. Now the obvious joke is that, when drunk and slurring words Patty, becomes Paddy. Go ahead and try it put on a fake drunk accent or if you have some spare time get an audio recording device and hoist a few! OR just watch that episode of “Rescue Me” that takes place on St. Patrick’s day.
Remember of course to keep accurate records because,... my theory is that if you can pinpoint the exact amount of alcohol it takes for the hard “t” sounds in “Patty” to become the decidedly softer “d” sounds present in the word “Paddy”. You may have discovered something of scientific importance.
Now the other thing. If you are one of those people who live to surf around and correct people’s posts. If literally every comment you leave has to do with correcting something someone else has said. Then please feel free to DIE, DIE, HURRY UP AND DIE!!!!!
Have a happy and safe St. Patrick’s Day..
Tila Tequilla Juggalo Attack
25/08/10 17:33
Well, believe it or not I am not one to keep up with pop culture. I do however listen to the Tell Em’ Steve Dave Podcast. This is where I learned that Tila Tequilla was attacked at the gathering of the Juggalos. I must admit I had no idea who Tila Tequilla was but after spending some time on YouTube I was shocked by the response this incident has gotten.
It’s mostly making excuses for why it was okay to throw things not only at the object of mindless rage but also at the bodyguards who were just there doing a job. Then in an attempt to lighten the mood Tom Green steps out onto the stage and does a little dance! Juggalos threw things at him as well! In fact some people even tried to float the idea that it was ok to throw things at Tila because all the acts got the same treatment!
First of all you shouldn’t be throwing things at ANYONE! This is supposed to be about enjoying musical entertainment, not hucking shit at people! I mean MONKEYS throw shit at people, I thought we higher primates were above that sort of thing?
You can’t blame ICP for this either. Don’t sit on your high horse and make fun of people who enjoy performers who wear clown makup if you’re not gonna say the same thing when Kiss comes to town! This is a respect issue plain and simple. The problem is one of perception.
When we all had to pay for music, it forced us into a certain respect for the artist. If you loved the music enough to pay for it, that said something about you and the artist. Now musical content is more or less free. This has left a void in the marketplace that has been filled with people who crave fame at all cost above anything else ,.. even respect.
So now we find ourselves at a concert, we had to pay an assload of money to get in cause musicians gotta eat too. So out of resentment for the high ticket price we decide that the high cost entitles us a to behave like animals? Is that what this is? Well, if that’s the case it’s your own fault!
If you bought a ticket to that show and you were so offended by Tila’s appearance there you should have stayed home or showed up late. Other choices would have included, beer break, toke at the back of the venue, going for a walk, listening to some other music on your ipod, leaving the venue. The point is, hucking shit from the porta potty onto the stage is way, way down the list of possible reactions!
You simply don’t have the right to throw things at people just because you don’t like them.
It’s mostly making excuses for why it was okay to throw things not only at the object of mindless rage but also at the bodyguards who were just there doing a job. Then in an attempt to lighten the mood Tom Green steps out onto the stage and does a little dance! Juggalos threw things at him as well! In fact some people even tried to float the idea that it was ok to throw things at Tila because all the acts got the same treatment!
First of all you shouldn’t be throwing things at ANYONE! This is supposed to be about enjoying musical entertainment, not hucking shit at people! I mean MONKEYS throw shit at people, I thought we higher primates were above that sort of thing?
You can’t blame ICP for this either. Don’t sit on your high horse and make fun of people who enjoy performers who wear clown makup if you’re not gonna say the same thing when Kiss comes to town! This is a respect issue plain and simple. The problem is one of perception.
When we all had to pay for music, it forced us into a certain respect for the artist. If you loved the music enough to pay for it, that said something about you and the artist. Now musical content is more or less free. This has left a void in the marketplace that has been filled with people who crave fame at all cost above anything else ,.. even respect.
So now we find ourselves at a concert, we had to pay an assload of money to get in cause musicians gotta eat too. So out of resentment for the high ticket price we decide that the high cost entitles us a to behave like animals? Is that what this is? Well, if that’s the case it’s your own fault!
If you bought a ticket to that show and you were so offended by Tila’s appearance there you should have stayed home or showed up late. Other choices would have included, beer break, toke at the back of the venue, going for a walk, listening to some other music on your ipod, leaving the venue. The point is, hucking shit from the porta potty onto the stage is way, way down the list of possible reactions!
You simply don’t have the right to throw things at people just because you don’t like them.
Hey! What are you looking at!
14/07/09 02:05
Hey! What are you looking at?
Do you really want an answer?
There are several instances that we get asked the very pointed question "what are you looking at"? It's a phrase that is most often shouted or spoken forcefully. Many times the answer to this question marks the start of some sort of argument. Think about this, do you really want an answer? Are you just opening yourself up for public embarrassment?
Here are just a few examples.
The Freaks
And yes I use the term lightly
One segment of society that seems to make frequent use of the question in question are people that some would say have a freakish appearance or exhibit freakish behavior. People with 15 nose-rings and a tattoo of an aardvark on their neck sort of spring to mind. I don't personally have any tattoos but I will admit some of this artwork is simply amazing. What I can't fathom is why you would spend 8 hours being repeatedly stabbed by a needle in order to have a beautiful rendition of an aardvark on your neck,... if you didn't want people to look at it! I mean you can't see it yourself without a mirror.
I kinda understand it in a way. This is the punk rock counter culture. Punk rockers (the real ones) feel that by expressing thoughts contrary to societal norm that they are expressing individuality. So they rush out for an aardvark to the neck which any normal sane person would find strange and look at with puzzled expressions. The next step is to forever use this aardvark to make normal people feel bad for finding this tattoo and it's placement odd somehow. The part the average person unfortunately doesn't get to see when they walk away is the following conversation:
Punk 1 - HAha I made that guy feel like an idiot!
Punk 2 - Yeah totally that was awesome!
Punk 3 - Yeah but dude you have a F@$king AARDVARK ON YOUR NECK!!!!!
Those of you that have really cool tattoos that don't mind people looking at them are the ones that are really expressing yourselves. The fact that you are so into the artwork that you are consenting to allow the artist to use your body as a canvas is a level of commitment that few people reach. It's not for everyone and you accept that fact so bonus points for you!
Those Over-Burdoned by Beauty
I'm Too Sexy to LIVE!
I live in the downtown core of a University town. This is where all the bars are. If you can find a place to park you can go club hopping on foot because every other building has a bar in it. Summer and winter alike the clothing is scarcer than an original thought in Hollywood! Sometimes when I go out for a walk on a Friday or Saturday night my eyes feel like ping-png balls from the over activity. Occasionally I see a woman who is just extraordinarily beautiful and I just can't help but stare. I mean I try not to. I try to use my peripheral vision. I don't want to appear creepy after all. On even rarer occasions a woman such as this will catch my gaze and smile back at me. At this point she is officially out of my league because she was able to look at my expression, realize my appreciation of her beauty and make the decision to be flattered. This denotes above average intelligence. Strikingly beautiful intelligent women seem to steer clear of unknown Musicians, non best selling writers and guys that need to spend some time in the gym. I am all three.
Other times an amazingly beautiful woman looks back at you and says "What the F@$k are you looking at"? For some reason I can't explain, they go from awe inspiring beauty to fugly in 0.0000043 seconds flat. A defence mechanism perhaps?
Just once I would like to have the presence of mind to say something biting and witty but I'm afraid my remark would lose all it's power when I have to explain what I meant...
Guy Who Catches you Looking at His Girlfriend
,... and he's also drunk.
If you have a girlfriend and she's attractive, my looking or seeming to look at her should not be taken as an insult to your masculinity. If you're that insecure that you think I can walk up, and whisper "let's go" in her ear and steal her away from you, I'm probably not your biggest problem. You may need to do some self esteem work or your girlfriend may be looking to escape your relationship. It could also be that your girlfriend is extremely eager to please! In either case if I am really stealing her away I am doing you a favor.
It's more likely that the two of you are standing at the bar and I'm trying to get the bartender's attention so I can order a drink. This also explains the side to side body motion that is causing me to rub against her. She's tall and I have to look over her shoulder first to her left,...then over to her right to see the bartender! If this offends you just imagine I'm doing it to you!
See that? By comparison it's not so bad!
The Differently Able
,... and the crowd goes mild!
I was crossing the street less than a block from my apartment and there were two morbidly obese women in wheelchairs one of whom had both legs amputated just below the knee.Yes I understand that it's difficult to stay fit when confined to a wheelchair I mention their weight only to paint a picture of the actual situation not to make fun of people who are overweight.
I wasn't staring, I really wasn't. I was facing their direction and looking at the lights waiting for them to change so I could cross the street. The non-amputee began to shout at me. "Haven't you ever seen a disabled person before"? Now it's not like I leered at her disabled friend or made some expression of shock or horror at the sight of her. Often times when I see someone with a disability I wonder how I would cope if I were disabled in the same way. I think that's an honest reaction really, but perhaps I'm wrong.
What makes me angry is this stupid cow, this unlikely union of a bloated Fembot and a Daleck actually thinks that I'm looking at her friend and thinking things like "haha I've got legs and you don't". Here I am waiting for the light trying to empathize with the plight of a disabled person, doing all of this in my head of course which makes it my own business!
This caused me to have an epiphany. This is the very reason people resent disabled parking spots! When they see that the only parking spot within a quarter mile of the shop they want to go into is reserved for the handicapped they don't think of the decent kind and considerate differently able person (which is the vast majority of people that need to use these spaces) they think of Attila the rolling hun on the street corner blocking the entire sidewalk yelling "i can stare longer than you can".
Do you really want an answer?
There are several instances that we get asked the very pointed question "what are you looking at"? It's a phrase that is most often shouted or spoken forcefully. Many times the answer to this question marks the start of some sort of argument. Think about this, do you really want an answer? Are you just opening yourself up for public embarrassment?
Here are just a few examples.
The Freaks
And yes I use the term lightly
One segment of society that seems to make frequent use of the question in question are people that some would say have a freakish appearance or exhibit freakish behavior. People with 15 nose-rings and a tattoo of an aardvark on their neck sort of spring to mind. I don't personally have any tattoos but I will admit some of this artwork is simply amazing. What I can't fathom is why you would spend 8 hours being repeatedly stabbed by a needle in order to have a beautiful rendition of an aardvark on your neck,... if you didn't want people to look at it! I mean you can't see it yourself without a mirror.
I kinda understand it in a way. This is the punk rock counter culture. Punk rockers (the real ones) feel that by expressing thoughts contrary to societal norm that they are expressing individuality. So they rush out for an aardvark to the neck which any normal sane person would find strange and look at with puzzled expressions. The next step is to forever use this aardvark to make normal people feel bad for finding this tattoo and it's placement odd somehow. The part the average person unfortunately doesn't get to see when they walk away is the following conversation:
Punk 1 - HAha I made that guy feel like an idiot!
Punk 2 - Yeah totally that was awesome!
Punk 3 - Yeah but dude you have a F@$king AARDVARK ON YOUR NECK!!!!!
Those of you that have really cool tattoos that don't mind people looking at them are the ones that are really expressing yourselves. The fact that you are so into the artwork that you are consenting to allow the artist to use your body as a canvas is a level of commitment that few people reach. It's not for everyone and you accept that fact so bonus points for you!
Those Over-Burdoned by Beauty
I'm Too Sexy to LIVE!
I live in the downtown core of a University town. This is where all the bars are. If you can find a place to park you can go club hopping on foot because every other building has a bar in it. Summer and winter alike the clothing is scarcer than an original thought in Hollywood! Sometimes when I go out for a walk on a Friday or Saturday night my eyes feel like ping-png balls from the over activity. Occasionally I see a woman who is just extraordinarily beautiful and I just can't help but stare. I mean I try not to. I try to use my peripheral vision. I don't want to appear creepy after all. On even rarer occasions a woman such as this will catch my gaze and smile back at me. At this point she is officially out of my league because she was able to look at my expression, realize my appreciation of her beauty and make the decision to be flattered. This denotes above average intelligence. Strikingly beautiful intelligent women seem to steer clear of unknown Musicians, non best selling writers and guys that need to spend some time in the gym. I am all three.
Other times an amazingly beautiful woman looks back at you and says "What the F@$k are you looking at"? For some reason I can't explain, they go from awe inspiring beauty to fugly in 0.0000043 seconds flat. A defence mechanism perhaps?
Just once I would like to have the presence of mind to say something biting and witty but I'm afraid my remark would lose all it's power when I have to explain what I meant...
Guy Who Catches you Looking at His Girlfriend
,... and he's also drunk.
If you have a girlfriend and she's attractive, my looking or seeming to look at her should not be taken as an insult to your masculinity. If you're that insecure that you think I can walk up, and whisper "let's go" in her ear and steal her away from you, I'm probably not your biggest problem. You may need to do some self esteem work or your girlfriend may be looking to escape your relationship. It could also be that your girlfriend is extremely eager to please! In either case if I am really stealing her away I am doing you a favor.
It's more likely that the two of you are standing at the bar and I'm trying to get the bartender's attention so I can order a drink. This also explains the side to side body motion that is causing me to rub against her. She's tall and I have to look over her shoulder first to her left,...then over to her right to see the bartender! If this offends you just imagine I'm doing it to you!
See that? By comparison it's not so bad!
The Differently Able
,... and the crowd goes mild!
I was crossing the street less than a block from my apartment and there were two morbidly obese women in wheelchairs one of whom had both legs amputated just below the knee.Yes I understand that it's difficult to stay fit when confined to a wheelchair I mention their weight only to paint a picture of the actual situation not to make fun of people who are overweight.
I wasn't staring, I really wasn't. I was facing their direction and looking at the lights waiting for them to change so I could cross the street. The non-amputee began to shout at me. "Haven't you ever seen a disabled person before"? Now it's not like I leered at her disabled friend or made some expression of shock or horror at the sight of her. Often times when I see someone with a disability I wonder how I would cope if I were disabled in the same way. I think that's an honest reaction really, but perhaps I'm wrong.
What makes me angry is this stupid cow, this unlikely union of a bloated Fembot and a Daleck actually thinks that I'm looking at her friend and thinking things like "haha I've got legs and you don't". Here I am waiting for the light trying to empathize with the plight of a disabled person, doing all of this in my head of course which makes it my own business!
This caused me to have an epiphany. This is the very reason people resent disabled parking spots! When they see that the only parking spot within a quarter mile of the shop they want to go into is reserved for the handicapped they don't think of the decent kind and considerate differently able person (which is the vast majority of people that need to use these spaces) they think of Attila the rolling hun on the street corner blocking the entire sidewalk yelling "i can stare longer than you can".
Vinyl Isn't Coming Back, It's Festering!
03/07/09 04:29
Lately I have seen a number of articles declaring that vinyl records are making some sort of comeback. It might seem this way but I surmise that this so-called resurgence is little more than a mirage. The fact that teenagers are picking through dollar bins in used music stores looking for music is the result of a few things that are happening right now.
First of all, most major label music sucks! The upshot of this is that listeners are turning to other outlets for musical enjoyment. Since there is an amazing back catalog available in the used music shops it’s easy to see why people would be attracted to the selection and the low prices. Let’s keep in mind that this is product on the resale market and only a diehard few vinyl fans are buying newly manufactured LPs. New Vinyl averages at $25 -$45 per Lp. So really the resurgence here is in use of turntables rather than new music sales. I’d also like to point out that most of the music from the 80’s and first half of the 90’s featured better recordings of better musicians than we typically find today. Don’t believe me? Take a typical 80’s band, let say Tears for Fears, and listen to the quality of the recording versus a typical band from today, let’s say Fallout Boy. See what I mean? There is a very good reason for this discrepancy in sound quality. In the 80’s and early 90’s music (even indie music) was mostly recorded in studios manned by actual recording engineers. The average album took between 6 weeks and 3 months to produce. You could afford to do this because you would then have a product that had value that you could sell. Today music is recorded (in many cases) just as quickly and cheaply as possible, many times in makeshift home studios by people who aren’t as adept at producing a high quality of sound. So what we have is the following trend:
The end product is worth less and, so knowing this, bands and labels put less effort and money into the recording process.
Remember when you were a kid and it made you so happy that you had a baseball card, or an action figure or anything little Billy across the street didn’t have? A similar thing is at play here. Since much of vinyl available at your average used record shop was never released on CD it’s not all that difficult to find great music that isn’t available on the internet for download. This means you have tunes that little Billy doesn’t, and he’s gonna have to go search for another copy of the LP if he want’s to own it! Current music is available on the internet, so even if little Billy is too lazy to track it down for free he can just pay the $.99 and get the songs from iTunes.
I think this so called resurgence will keep getting press until we finally find a solid way to monetize music. When the bottom line improves for the people who create music, my guess is so will all aspects of the quality of the music itself.
First of all, most major label music sucks! The upshot of this is that listeners are turning to other outlets for musical enjoyment. Since there is an amazing back catalog available in the used music shops it’s easy to see why people would be attracted to the selection and the low prices. Let’s keep in mind that this is product on the resale market and only a diehard few vinyl fans are buying newly manufactured LPs. New Vinyl averages at $25 -$45 per Lp. So really the resurgence here is in use of turntables rather than new music sales. I’d also like to point out that most of the music from the 80’s and first half of the 90’s featured better recordings of better musicians than we typically find today. Don’t believe me? Take a typical 80’s band, let say Tears for Fears, and listen to the quality of the recording versus a typical band from today, let’s say Fallout Boy. See what I mean? There is a very good reason for this discrepancy in sound quality. In the 80’s and early 90’s music (even indie music) was mostly recorded in studios manned by actual recording engineers. The average album took between 6 weeks and 3 months to produce. You could afford to do this because you would then have a product that had value that you could sell. Today music is recorded (in many cases) just as quickly and cheaply as possible, many times in makeshift home studios by people who aren’t as adept at producing a high quality of sound. So what we have is the following trend:
The end product is worth less and, so knowing this, bands and labels put less effort and money into the recording process.
Remember when you were a kid and it made you so happy that you had a baseball card, or an action figure or anything little Billy across the street didn’t have? A similar thing is at play here. Since much of vinyl available at your average used record shop was never released on CD it’s not all that difficult to find great music that isn’t available on the internet for download. This means you have tunes that little Billy doesn’t, and he’s gonna have to go search for another copy of the LP if he want’s to own it! Current music is available on the internet, so even if little Billy is too lazy to track it down for free he can just pay the $.99 and get the songs from iTunes.
I think this so called resurgence will keep getting press until we finally find a solid way to monetize music. When the bottom line improves for the people who create music, my guess is so will all aspects of the quality of the music itself.
False Idol, - Rise of the Independants!
11/05/09 12:34
Well, American Idol has been on for a few years now and it still boggles my mind that people are so excited about this show. It may be a clever amalgamation of reality TV and a game show. Some of the singers may actually be talented people. Having said this I wonder how many of my favorite singers would actually even make it on the show, let alone win the competition! I mean I do listen to some pretty obscure stuff, but I do count some pretty Iconic people amongst my personal favorites.
Can you imagine a young David Bowie on American Idol? There are few people who even come close to being as prolific or respected in the music industry. He has got one of the most distinctive voices in popular music! I can’t picture him or anyone even close to him appearing on “Idol”. So if that’s the case, what’s the point of it? Some of the best singers in music history have voices that just won’t do the acrobatic tricks that most of the contestants on American Idol trill out like well coiffed poodles jumping through hoops!
When I think about popular singers in general even ones I don’t particularly like, few of them are American Idol material. Freddie Mercury of Queen perhaps, if he would have been willing to submit to some creative dentistry and severely tone down the “gay thing”. I mean we all seemed to like him just fine the way he was and to this day I am in awe of his voice, but that’s just not going to fly these days! I get visions of Simon, telling Freddy to lose the bright yellow suit, giving him tips like “be less flamboyant” and so on!
I think this is all an indication of the contrived nature of popular music these days. No wonder the kids aren’t paying for this stuff! Fake tits, fake talent, audio plastic, 100% creativity free! Every other song is a remake. I don’t blame the artists, why put your heart and soul into a piece of music that, if things go well, could be a really annoying ringtone! And shows like American Idol present this type of music as the paragon of popular music. It’s sad but there is an upside. I saw it at the skate park as I cycled by the other day. No less than five kids all wearing Pink Floyd T shirts!
I guess the point is this. Are Shows like “Idol” an indication that something is wrong with people in general. Is the popularity of the show a harbinger of doom for a music industry that is pretty much on life support as it is? Should more of us be seeking out new independent artists who still have the courage to at least attempt to make a living by writing honest songs and presenting them in an honest way? I have thought about this quite a bit, and if there’s a bright future for music on the horizon, it’s the independent artists NOT the mainstream major labels that we need to pay attention to. When I was a kid we worshipped our idols, perhaps the time has come to start ignoring them!
Can you imagine a young David Bowie on American Idol? There are few people who even come close to being as prolific or respected in the music industry. He has got one of the most distinctive voices in popular music! I can’t picture him or anyone even close to him appearing on “Idol”. So if that’s the case, what’s the point of it? Some of the best singers in music history have voices that just won’t do the acrobatic tricks that most of the contestants on American Idol trill out like well coiffed poodles jumping through hoops!
When I think about popular singers in general even ones I don’t particularly like, few of them are American Idol material. Freddie Mercury of Queen perhaps, if he would have been willing to submit to some creative dentistry and severely tone down the “gay thing”. I mean we all seemed to like him just fine the way he was and to this day I am in awe of his voice, but that’s just not going to fly these days! I get visions of Simon, telling Freddy to lose the bright yellow suit, giving him tips like “be less flamboyant” and so on!
I think this is all an indication of the contrived nature of popular music these days. No wonder the kids aren’t paying for this stuff! Fake tits, fake talent, audio plastic, 100% creativity free! Every other song is a remake. I don’t blame the artists, why put your heart and soul into a piece of music that, if things go well, could be a really annoying ringtone! And shows like American Idol present this type of music as the paragon of popular music. It’s sad but there is an upside. I saw it at the skate park as I cycled by the other day. No less than five kids all wearing Pink Floyd T shirts!
I guess the point is this. Are Shows like “Idol” an indication that something is wrong with people in general. Is the popularity of the show a harbinger of doom for a music industry that is pretty much on life support as it is? Should more of us be seeking out new independent artists who still have the courage to at least attempt to make a living by writing honest songs and presenting them in an honest way? I have thought about this quite a bit, and if there’s a bright future for music on the horizon, it’s the independent artists NOT the mainstream major labels that we need to pay attention to. When I was a kid we worshipped our idols, perhaps the time has come to start ignoring them!